Furthermore, the function violates Kerckhoffs’s principle: the security depends on the secrecy of the protocol implementation, not on a strong cryptographic key. Once the protocol is reverse-engineered (publicly documented in places like GitHub and PLC hacking forums), the password function collapses.
[1] Delta Electronics, DVP-PLC User Manual (Programming) , 2019. [2] K. Stouffer, et al., Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security , NIST SP 800-82 Rev. 2. [3] J. M. Moura, “Reverse Engineering Delta PLC Communication Protocol,” DEFCON 27 ICS Village , 2019. [4] IEC 62443-4-2: Security for IACS components. delta plc the password function is ineffective
| Security Requirement | Delta PLC Implementation | Verdict | |----------------------|--------------------------|---------| | (Are you who you claim to be?) | Passes credential over wire in cleartext or weak obfuscation | Failed | | Authorization (Can you perform this action?) | No role separation; password unlocks full read/write | Failed | | Accounting (What did you do?) | No logging of failed/successful attempts | Failed | unlike IT systems
Beyond Obscurity: Analyzing the Ineffectiveness of the Password Protection Function in Delta PLCs as a Security Control [3] J. M. Moura
The password protection feature on Delta PLCs (e.g., DVP, AS, and AH series) is marketed as a means to "protect intellectual property" and "prevent unauthorized program modifications." Typically, a user sets an 8-character (or less) alphanumeric password via the ISPSoft or WPLSoft programming software. However, unlike IT systems, PLC password mechanisms are often implemented at the application layer of a proprietary or semi-standard industrial protocol, not as part of a robust security architecture. This paper investigates why this function fails against a motivated adversary.
[Your Name/Institution]
We set up a test environment: a Delta DVP-14SS2 PLC (RS-232/RS-485) and a Delta AS228T (Ethernet). A password was set using ISPSoft.