CONSEIL
PRÉCÉDENT
NOS SPONSORS
But to watch director Iulia Răzvan’s sophomore feature as a horror film is to misread its deepest intentions. Fantoma Mea Iubita (literal translation: My Beloved Ghost ) is not a ghost story. It is a grief story wearing a ghost’s skin. And in its quiet, devastating meditation on post-communist emotional illiteracy, it reveals something the streaming giant rarely allows: a portrait of love as a haunting we choose to endure. The plot is deceptively simple. Ana (Adina Simionescu), a thirty-something architect in Bucharest, loses her husband, Ștefan, in a mundane car accident. A year later, she begins to see him—not as a specter to be exorcised, but as a fully embodied presence who returns every evening at 9:17 PM. He makes coffee. He asks about her day. He lies beside her in silence. The rules are never explained. There is no vengeful spirit, no unresolved business, no medium to cross over. Ștefan simply is .
In the relentless churn of Netflix’s algorithmic content library, where a glossy K-drama sits next to a true-crime docuseries, the Romanian film Fantoma Mea Iubita (2023) initially appears as a genre placeholder. The thumbnail—a pale woman in a lace veil, a man with hollow eyes—suggests a familiar Eastern European horror: damp corridors, whispered incantations, jump scares timed to a minor-key string stab.
This inversion is the film’s masterstroke. The ghost is not a diminished echo of life; he is an improvement upon it. Ana is not haunted by a traumatic memory of her husband’s flaws. She is haunted by a perfected version of him—one who finally learned to say “I love you” three months too late. fantoma mea iubita netflix
The message is cruel but honest: living bodies cannot compete with the ideal. The ghost asks nothing. He never snores, never leaves socks on the floor, never argues about money. He is pure presence—the ultimate male fantasy turned inside out, now weaponized as a woman’s prison. Why does this film belong on Netflix? On the surface, it seems like a poor fit for a platform whose algorithm rewards high-concept loglines (“A grieving architect falls in love with her dead husband’s ghost!”). But Fantoma Mea Iubita has quietly become a sleeper hit in Central and Eastern Europe, and its slow spread through word-of-mouth reveals something about the streaming economy’s blind spot.
One sequence is devastating in its simplicity. Ana has a one-night stand with a kind, living colleague (Mihai Călin). The scene is shot in flat, unflattering medium shots. The sex is awkward, efficient, over in ninety seconds. Afterwards, Ana lies awake, and the camera holds on her face for a full minute—no dialogue, no score. Then she turns to the empty space beside her, reaches out her hand, and closes her eyes. Cut to 9:17 PM. Ștefan is there, and she smiles. But to watch director Iulia Răzvan’s sophomore feature
Netflix excels at what media scholar Marc Steinberg calls “affective efficiency”—content that triggers predictable emotional responses (sadness, fear, catharsis) at predictable intervals. Fantoma Mea Iubita refuses efficiency. It is slow, ambiguous, and unresolved. The final shot offers no closure: Ana looks out her window at a gray Bucharest morning, and Ștefan’s reflection fades—not dramatically, but as if he simply forgot to exist.
This is the terror the genre tags obscure: not the fear of being haunted, but the fear that you might stop being haunted. That you might one day wake up and feel nothing. The ghost, in Răzvan’s vision, is not a curse. It is the last tether to a self you no longer know how to be. Fantoma Mea Iubita is not an easy film to love. It demands patience for its silences, tolerance for its melancholy, and a willingness to sit with discomfort rather than resolve it. But for those who enter its world, it offers a rare gift: permission to acknowledge that some loves do not end, and some ghosts are not meant to be exorcised. And in its quiet, devastating meditation on post-communist
The film’s radical choice is its refusal to pathologize this phenomenon. Ana’s sister calls a priest. Her mother suggests a psychiatrist. But Răzvan’s camera never judges Ana’s perception. Instead, it lingers on the banal rituals of haunting: the extra plate set at dinner, the paused conversation when a friend enters the room, the way Ana’s hand hovers over the empty side of the bed before deciding not to sleep there.
Viewers expecting a twist (he was never real! she is the ghost!) will be frustrated. Răzvan provides no diagnostic frame. The film ends not with acceptance, but with continuation. Ana will go to work. She will see her ghost tonight. And perhaps tomorrow. And perhaps forever.
In an era where grief is medicalized, timed, and expected to conclude within a socially acceptable window, Răzvan’s film is a quiet rebellion. It insists that the dead remain alive in the spaces we refuse to clean out—the second pillow, the saved voicemail, the coffee made for two. And it suggests, with devastating tenderness, that to truly love someone might be to let them haunt you forever.
The ghost, however, occupies a different register. He appears only in soft, edge-lit scenes: the kitchen at dusk, the bedroom under a single reading lamp, the bathtub where steam blurs the lens. These are the only moments the film allows itself chiaroscuro—the romantic play of light and shadow that mainstream cinema reserves for love scenes. Răzvan is telling us, frame by frame, that the most romantic relationship in this film is between a woman and a dead man.