Georges Mounin Dictionnaire De La Linguistique Pdf -

Unlike modern dictionaries (Crystal, Trask) that attempt a balanced, synoptic view, Mounin’s dictionary is a . What You Actually Get (The Good) 1. The "Signe" is Sovereign Open any page. The influence of Saussure, Martinet, and Benveniste is absolute. For Mounin, linguistics is not about psychological reality (Chomsky) or computation; it is about systems , oppositions , and substance vs. form . If you want a crystal-clear, brutally French definition of signifiant/signifié , this is your bible. The PDF gives you access to that pre-Chomskyan, European flavor of linguistics that is often lost in modern English-centric texts.

Mounin was a giant, but he was a French giant. The dictionary heavily favors the Paris School. American structuralism (Bloomfield) is mentioned, but often dismissively. Hjelmslev gets more space than Chomsky. If you are an English-speaking student looking for a universal dictionary, this PDF will feel provincial. It is the dictionary of French linguistics, not world linguistics. georges mounin dictionnaire de la linguistique pdf

The physical book has a terrible layout (dense, tiny fonts, no illustrations). The PDF actually improves it. You can Ctrl+F for "Saussure" and see how his shadow looms over every other page. You can screenshot the famous "communication circuit" diagram (one of the few images) and paste it into a lecture slide. The Warnings (The Bad & The Obsolete) 1. The Missing Decades (1975–Present) Here is the elephant in the library. If you search for "Generative Grammar" (Grammaire générative), Mounin treats it like a promising but dangerous teenage fad. There is no Cognitive Linguistics. No Discourse Analysis as we know it. No Corpus Linguistics. The PDF is brilliant for history of ideas but dangerous if you think it is a current reference. You will find no definition of "Construction Grammar" or "Emergent Grammar." Unlike modern dictionaries (Crystal, Trask) that attempt a

Here is a critical, interesting review of the PDF version of this classic work, focusing on why someone would seek it out today. The Hunt for the PDF Let’s start with the fact that you are searching for a PDF of Mounin’s 1974 dictionary. In an age of Wikipedia and Glottopedia, why? The answer reveals the book’s true value: it captures a precise, thrilling moment in time when Structuralism was king, but Generative Grammar was the noisy, disruptive neighbor. The influence of Saussure, Martinet, and Benveniste is

The very act of searching for "Mounin PDF" is ironically linguistic. The word dictionnaire promises a stable, complete archive. But the PDF is a digital, fragmented ghost of a paper object that was already a ghost of 1970s intellectual debates. Use it to understand what linguistics used to be , not what it is.

This is a specific and interesting request because occupies a unique place in the history of linguistic reference works. It is not as encyclopedic as Ducrot & Todorov, nor as purely pedagogical as a textbook glossary.

Most dictionaries define terms. Mounin often defines schools . Look up "Fonctionnalisme." In an English dictionary, you get a paragraph. In Mounin, you get a dense, historical mini-essay linking the Prague School to Martinet. The PDF is a joy to search for terms like cratylisme or glossématique because Mounin assumes you are an advanced student who already knows the basics.