But if I try (a→n, b→o, etc.):
Actually, if you type each letter on QWERTY: i → u d → s a → ' (apostrophe) — so maybe not.
or similar. But without more cipher clues, it’s ambiguous.
w → q (no) — so that’s not right. Given the pattern "i---" at the start, maybe it's on "i---" → v--- which doesn't help. But "byw" twice — could be "the" or "and"? Possibly the phrase is: "I--- [something] [something] and the the [something] [something]" — maybe "bray" = "from" or "like"? i--- danlwd wy py an byw byw bray wyndwz
Actually — known trick: (shift +1) for the real message: i → j d a n l w d → e b o m x e w y → x z p y → q z a n → b o b y w → c z x b y w → c z x b r a y → c s b z w y n d w z → x z o e x a
Let’s test a few: i → u (on QWERTY, i’s left is u) d → s a → ' (apostrophe — no, that’s odd) — maybe right shift instead.
That’s: r--- wzmodw db kb zm ybd ybd yizb dbmwda — not English. But I notice: danlwd with rot13 is q nay jq — no. But "danlwd" reversed is dwl nad → "dwl" not a word. Another common trick: . But if I try (a→n, b→o, etc
Instead, try (each letter typed with the key to its right on QWERTY): i → o d → f a → s n → m l → ; w → e d → f That doesn’t match "window" either.
Given "byw" appears twice and "bray" likely "by" + "ray"? Could be (a↔z, b↔y, etc.):
i → v d a n l w d → q n a y j q w y → j l p y → c l a n → n a b y w → o l j b y w → o l j b r a y → o e n l w y n d w z → j l a q j m w → q (no) — so that’s not right
But the phrase "i--- danlwd wy py an byw byw bray wyndwz" — if I read it aloud, "danlwd" could be "window" if you shift each letter by one key? Let’s test "window" typed left-shifted:
It looks like you're working with a simple cipher — likely a shift cipher (like rot13) or keyboard shift. The string "i--- danlwd wy py an byw byw bray wyndwz" appears to be a jumbled or encoded phrase.
Result: v--- qnayjq jl cl na olj olj oenl jlaqjm — also not quite English.
That's gibberish. Given time, the simplest plausible decoding of "danlwd" is if we apply Atbash (a↔z, b↔y, etc.): d(4) ↔ w(23) a(1) ↔ z(26) n(14) ↔ m(13) l(12) ↔ o(15) w(23) ↔ d(4) d(4) ↔ w(23) → "wzmodw" — no. Wait, Atbash of "danlwd" is "wzmodw" — not window. But given the symmetry, I'll guess the intended decoded phrase is:
i → r d a n l w d → w z m o d w w y → d b p y → k b a n → z m b y w → y b d b y w → y b d b r a y → y i z b w y n d w z → d b m w d a