Sign in

Sign up

Pocahontas Ii Apr 2026

Then came 1998’s direct-to-video sequel, Pocahontas II: Journey to a New World . If the original was a problematic fantasy, the sequel is a historical train wreck that trades nuance for slapstick and tragedy for a bland diplomatic road trip. Two decades later, it stands as one of Disney’s most baffling and irresponsible follow-ups. The film picks up after the first movie. John Smith (Mel Gibson, in his final voice role for Disney) is reported dead, and Pocahontas (now voiced by Irene Bedard, with singing by Judy Kuhn) is grieving. Enter the ambitious English settler John Rolfe (Billy Zane), who arrives in Virginia with a mission: persuade Chief Powhatan to negotiate peace with King James I. When the chief refuses to go, Pocahontas volunteers to travel to London as a diplomat.

Even worse, the film vilifies the real Pocahontas’s own community. Chief Powhatan is portrayed as stubborn and isolationist, while her people are reduced to a backdrop. The message is unmistakable: Europe offers civilization, diplomacy, and romance; Virginia offers only grief and war paint. Direct-to-video sequels of the 1990s were notorious for budget cuts, and Pocahontas II shows it. The fluid, watercolor-inspired landscapes of the original are replaced with flat, TV-budget backgrounds. Character movements are stiff, and the expressive wonder of the first film is gone. Even the animals—Meeko, Flit, and Percy—feel like tired comic relief, recycled without purpose. pocahontas ii

When Disney released Pocahontas in 1995, it was already swimming in controversy. Critics pointed out its flagrant historical inaccuracies—turning a 10-to-12-year-old Indigenous girl into a bustier-clad romantic heroine, sanitizing colonial violence, and inventing a love story with John Smith that defied reality. Yet the film’s lush animation, Alan Menken’s Oscar-winning score, and the earnest (if misguided) message of environmental harmony allowed audiences to forgive its sins as a “fairy tale.” The film picks up after the first movie

If you want to teach children about Pocahontas, skip the Disney sequels entirely. Hand them a book by a Powhatan scholar, or watch the documentary Pocahontas: Beyond the Myth . The real story is far more heartbreaking—but it deserves to be told with honesty, not softened into a journey to a new world where the only price of admission is amnesia. When the chief refuses to go, Pocahontas volunteers

Musically, the sequel lacks the iconic “Colors of the Wind” or “Just Around the Riverbend.” The new songs, such as “Where Do I Go from Here?” and “Between Two Worlds,” are forgettable adult contemporary ballads. They attempt to explore Pocahontas’s internal conflict but land with all the weight of a Hallmark card. You will not remember a single lyric ten minutes after the credits roll. Why does Pocahontas II matter beyond its mediocre animation? Because for millions of children who grew up in the 1990s and early 2000s, this was their only exposure to the end of Pocahontas’s story. Disney chose to follow a controversial film not with a correction or a mature reflection on colonialism, but with a cheerful fairy tale that erases kidnapping, cultural genocide, and premature death.

The sequel erases all of that. There is no captivity. No forced conversion. No early death. Instead, we get a plucky heroine in a ball gown, quipping about using a fork while a bumbling King James acts like a child in a pantomime. The film reduces one of colonial history’s most tragic figures—a young woman commodified and destroyed by English imperialism—into a cosmopolitan adventurer who simply chooses a different life.

The film reinforces the “happy Indian” trope—the idea that Indigenous peoples could have simply negotiated their way to survival if they’d been reasonable enough. It suggests that the real tragedy of Pocahontas wasn’t her exploitation, but that she didn’t get to see more of London. In doing so, it does a disservice not only to history but to the Powhatan Nation, which has repeatedly asked Disney to acknowledge the inaccuracies and harm caused by both films. Pocahontas II: Journey to a New World is not the worst animated film ever made. It has moments of mild charm, and Irene Bedard’s voice work remains dignified throughout. But as a sequel, it fails the original’s ambition. As history, it is dangerously revisionist. And as entertainment, it is largely boring.