The most significant factual issue is the calculation of “eligible basis.” The HFA has certified costs of $10 million. We have reviewed the cost certifications and find that they exclude ineligible costs (e.g., swimming pools, commercial space) as required by Reg. § 1.42-5. There is no evidence of “wash sales” or inflated contractor fees. Conclusion: With solid factual support, the claimed basis should survive IRS scrutiny.
Federal Income Tax Opinion – Solid Review Project: Riverfront Apartments (LIHTC Transaction) Taxpayer: Riverfront Housing Associates, LP sample tax opinion letter
Board of Directors Lender Partners, LLC 123 Finance Way New York, NY 10001 The most significant factual issue is the calculation
You have requested our opinion as tax counsel regarding certain federal income tax matters pertaining to the above-referenced taxpayer (the “Partnership”) and its proposed investment in the Riverfront Apartments project (the “Project”). Specifically, you have requested our opinion as to the eligibility of the Project for Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (“LIHTCs”) under Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and the likelihood that such credits will be available to the Partnership. There is no evidence of “wash sales” or
Section 42(g)(2)(D) provides a “vacancy allowance” for temporarily vacant units. The Partnership’s rent-up procedures are standard for the industry. While a prolonged vacancy could cause a violation, the GP’s history of successful projects (verified by us) makes this risk immaterial.