So final:
Another thought: could be a in English:
That’s not standard English, so maybe the original was just for fun as a scrambled puzzle.
thmyl → mythl (no) brnamj → jambrn (no) sewergems → smegrewes (no) alkrak → karkla Given the lack of obvious pattern, a likely intent is just : thmyl brnamj sewergems m alkrak
“smegrewes” = “sewergems” reversed — could be intended as “sewer gems” (literal). “alkrak” reversed is “karkla” — not common. “jmanrb” reversed “brnamj” — maybe “barn jm”? However, I notice: reversed: smegrewes → sounds like “smeg” (slang) + “rewes” (?) but “rewes” = “sewer” backwards. “smeg” + “sewer” maybe “smeg sewer”
But “sewergems” reversed = “smeg rewes” → sounds like “smeg” and “rewes” maybe "smeg" (from Red Dwarf) and "rewes" → "sewer" backwards.
Maybe it’s a simple letter shift: Try ROT13: So final: Another thought: could be a in
“m alkrak” → alkrak could be “karlak” or “karkla” — reversed: “karkla m” → maybe “karkla” no. But one strong guess: if we reverse each word: thmyl → lymht brnamj → jmanrb sewergems → smegrewes m alkrak → karkla m
“alkrak” reversed “karkla” → maybe “karkla” = “karkla” nothing.
brnamj → jambrn → “jamb” + rn? sewergems → gems + sewer → “gems sewer” — “gems” reversed is “smeg” — “smeg” is slang, “sewer” reversed is “rewes” not word. “jmanrb” reversed “brnamj” — maybe “barn jm”
thmyl → brnamj → jmanrb sewergems → smegrewes m alkrak → karkla m
thmyl → lymht brnamj → jmanrb sewergems → smegrewes m alkrak → karkla m
